Hesham Sayed Abbass Kamel

teacher of crculume

Basic Informations

C.V

Biography
? Hesham Sayed Abbass Kamel
? Date of Birth: 8 - 9 - 1981.
? Address: Makkah Flowers Towers (Al Narjis Tower) - Zohour District - Beni Suef
? Phone: 0822335284 - 01119771331
? Position: Teacher of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Beni Suef University.
? Email: heshamsayed33@yahoo.com, heshamsayed33@gmail.com
? Marital Status: Married and reliable.


1. Bachelor of Arts and Education May role with a very good grade (geography) Faculty of Education - Cairo University - Beni Suef Branch in 2002.
2. Special Diploma in Education with a very good grade - Faculty of Education - Cairo University Branch - Beni Suef - Specialization Educational Administration in 2005.
3. - Master of Education with excellent grade with the recommendation of course and publication - Faculty of Education - University of Beni Suef - in 2008 specialty "Educational Management.
4. Doctor of Philosophy in Education with the recommendation of course and publication - Faculty of Education - University of Beni Suef - in 2012 specialization "Educational Management.


1. Demonstrator at the Faculty of Education in Beni Suef (specialization in Educational Administration) from 2003-2008.
2. Assistant Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Beni Suef (specialization in Educational Administration) from 2009 - 2012
3. Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Suwayf (Educational Administration), 2012
4. Visiting professor at the Faculty of Education - Sultan Qaboos University in the period from 14/2/2015 to 18/6/2015 m.


The teaching philosophy is based on student-centered learning that allows him to access knowledge and information himself, which is compatible with the use of the credit hours system through active learning strategies, for example, according to each teaching situation:
? Collaborative learning - brainstorming - discussion and dialogue
? Seminars - Workshops.
? Point Presentations Power point - E-learning.
? ?ndividual and group research - research reports.
? Concept maps - corresponding - role-playing.
? Use self-assessment and group assessment methods to measure targeted learning outcomes.


? At the university level:
1. Rapporteur of the Educational Administration Third year in
2. Department of primary school fourth year primary
3. Comparative Education fourth year
? Postgraduate level:
4. Educational planning
5. Comparative Educational Administration
6. History and theories of management
7. Comparative education
? Research methods in education
8. . Educational and school administration
9. Courses taught at the College of Education - Sultan Qaboos University:
10. Educational supervision.
11. Educational leadership
12. History and theories of management


? Electronic management and management information systems
?   Human resources management and intellectual capital management
? Information and Communication Technology
? Statistical Quality Entrance
? E-supervision 
? Distributed leadership and diversity management
? Ethical decision making
? Measuring balanced performance
? Competitiveness
? Organizational learning and learning organization
? Management of volunteerism Strategic management and benchmarking
?

1. Mechanisms of activating the management of diversity in international schools in the Arab Republic of Egypt in the light of the experience of some countries (Journal of the Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University) under publication (2015).
2. Requirements of the Department of Voluntary Work in Pre-University Education in Egypt in the Light of Societal Needs (Journal of the Institute of Educational Studies - Cairo University) under publication (2015).
3. Participation in a research entitled "the use of management technology in educational decision-making educational departments in the Arab region," in the third international conference on educational technology held in the Gulf College - Sultanate of Oman from 24-26 March 2015.
4. Participation in a research entitled "the use of interdisciplinary approach in the management of diversity in Arab universities", in the conference held in the Faculty of Arts, Sultan Qaboos University in the month of 12/2015.
5. The role of management technology in the activation of educational decision-making local educational departments (Journal of the Faculty of Education - University of Beni Suef, No. 55, 2012).
6. Developing the performance of educational leaders in the light of the entrance to the management of intellectual capital (Journal of the Faculty of Education - Al-Azhar University, No. 33,2014)
7. Improving the competitive position of Egyptian universities in the light of quality standards and accreditation (Journal of the Faculty of Education - Al-Azhar University, No. 66, 2014)
8. Developing human resources management in Egyptian universities in the light of the re-engineering approach (Journal of the Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University, No. 77, 2013).
9. Mechanisms to improve the quality of educational services in universities in the light of critical success factors
10. An applied study on Beni Suef University), published in the twenty-fifth annual scientific conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Management on Saturday and Sunday, January 27 and 28, 2018, under the title "education systems and knowledge society."
11. a forward-looking vision of the functional competencies necessary for academic leaders in Egyptian universities - under publication.



1. A proposed educational map for the redistribution of educational services in the centers and villages of Beni Suef Governorate - Beni Suef University
2. eradication of illiteracy in the village of Nana and Bahna - Ihnasia Center - Beni Suef Governorate.
3. Participation in the research project funded by the Scientific Research Council in the Sultanate of Oman entitled "A proposed strategy to activate volunteer work in educational institutions as an added value in the light of human development requirements in the Sultanate of Oman.


1. Educational Crisis Management in Egypt in light of the standards of the Common Network for Education in Emergencies and Crises (INEE)
2. The role of school administration in strengthening the moral values of students in basic education in Egypt.
3. Improving the performance of industrial secondary schools in Beni Suef governorate in the light of the administration centered around the school.
4. Developing the role of technical supervisor in Egypt in light of transformational leadership.
5. administrative creativity and its relationship to job satisfaction with the principals of schools in Beni Suef.
6. The organization educated as an entrance to the development of primary school administration in Egypt.
7. A proposal to manage the excellence of the Egyptian school in the light of some international models.
8. a proposal to manage the work stress and its relationship to improve the performance of the performance of primary school principals in Egypt.
9. Improving the quality of educational service, Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University in the light of some contemporary university models (case study).
10. The relationship of organizational excellence to the entrance of transformational leadership in general secondary education in Egypt.


1. Certified trainer in the Center for the development of faculty members and human resources at the University of Beni Suef.
2. An external auditor accredited by the National Authority for Accreditation and Quality Assurance.
3. Certified Trainer at the Professional Academy of Teachers - Beni Suef Branch.
4. Certified trainer in the branch of culture of Beni Suef of the General Authority for Cultural Palaces.
5. Member of the selection of educational leaders in the Directorate of Education in Beni Suef

1. Training Course for Certified Trainer for Human Resources Development (TOT) organized by the IBCT (foundation of international board of certified trainers).
2. English as a Second Language Proficiency Course (TOFEL), Center for Foreign Languages and Specialized Translation, Faculty of Education, Beni Suef University.
3. Course in Computer for the International Computer Driving License (ICDL) in the period from January to March 2010 at the National Academy of Science and Technology in Beni Suef Governorate, and obtaining the International Computer Driving License.
4. Courses for the development of faculty members at the Center for the development of faculty members and human resources at the University of Beni Suef.
5. courses to prepare a strategic expert in total quality, which was organized by the quality center at the university in cooperation with the National Authority for Accreditation and Quality Assurance and include (descriptions of courses - external review - teaching and learning - self-evaluation and maps of the curriculum).
6. Training Course in Computer TOT Faculty of Science - Beni Suef University.
7. Winning the design of electronic courses and question banks belonging to the project of educational evaluation at the University of Suef.
8. Participation in projects and training programs of educational leaders within the programs / project of education development ERP, the project of improving education - the project of improving education in early childhood - the project of improving secondary education.
9. Participation in the supervision of the theses of the Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University, which deals with topics of crisis management, organizational values, electronic management and others.




? First: At the College and University Level:
1. Director of Quality and Accreditation Unit, Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University in the period from the academic year 2015 to 2016
2. Director of the Center for Literacy and Adult Education Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University since 2013 until 2015.
3. Member of the Committee for Community Service and Environmental Development Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University.
4. Member of the Committee to develop the strategic plan of the University.
5. Member of the Committee for internal review of quality faculties of Beni Suef University.
6. Member of the College Quality Committee (the development of the strategic plan for the college - the preparation of self-study of the college - the preparation of files and programs of curricula - the preparation of the annual report of the college).
? Second: Membership of Scientific and Private Associations:
1. Member of the Egyptian Society for Educational Administration and Comparative Education.
2. Member of the Association of Development in the village of Deir - Ahnasia Center - Beni Suef.
? Third: Lectures and Workshops:
3. Participating in training programs for the promotion of teachers and educational administrative leaderships of the Directorate of Education in Beni Suef Governorate (2014).
4. Participation in training programs for the preparation of university teacher, and programs to develop the capacity of faculty members at Beni Suef University (1014)
? Fourth: Conferences:
5. Participation in the first cultural forum of the Department of Educational Assets and Management at the Faculty of Education - Sultan Qaboos University for the academic year 2014/2015 entitled "Citizenship Values - Ways of Promoting them in the Omani Society" from 5-6 May.
6. The second scientific conference of the Faculty of Education in Beni Suef entitled "Childhood and creativity in the information age" (28-30) April 2004.
7. The 13th Annual Conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration in cooperation with the Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University, entitled "Accreditation and Quality Assurance of Educational Institutions" (29-30) January 2005.
8. The third scientific conference of the Faculty of Education in Beni Suef entitled "pre-university education curricula - reality and development strategies" (7, 8) May 2005.
9. The 14th Annual Conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration entitled "Globalization and the Education System in Egypt and the Arab World" (21-22) January 2006.
10. The fourth scientific conference of the Faculty of Education, Beni Suef, "the role of the family and civil society institutions in the discovery and care of people with special needs" (3-4) May 2006.
11. The fifteenth annual conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration entitled "qualifying educational leaders in Egypt and the Arab world" (27-28) January 2007.
12. The seventeenth annual conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration in cooperation with the Center of Knowledge Studies entitled "Education in the Islamic World: Recombinant and Different", (31) January, (1) February 2009.
13. The 9th Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Education, Minia University, 10-11 / 11/2009 entitled "Challenges of Education in the Arab World", held at the Faculty of Education - Minia University
14. The expanded symposium of the Faculty of Education - Beni Suef University entitled "Procedural Methods for Dealing with School Violence in Beni Suef Governorate", (8) December 2010.
15. Eighth Scientific Conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration entitled "Contemporary trends in the development of education in education in the Arab world", in the period from 2-7 February 2010.
16. . Scientific Symposium of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration entitled "Research Methodology in Comparative Education", (29) January 2011.
17. National Conference of Community Service and Environmental Development Sector, Beni Suef University, entitled "Technical Education and Labor Market Needs", (21) June 2011.
18. The 19th Annual Conference of the Egyptian Society for Comparative Education and Educational Administration entitled "Education and Human Development in the African Countries", (9) July 2011.
19. The First International Conference of Beni Suef University in cooperation with the Federation of Arab Universities entitled "Higher Education and the Labor Market", (10: 12) March 2012.
20. The Seventh Arab and International Conference of the Faculty of Specific Education, Mansoura University, Mansoura University, entitled "Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Management in Higher Education Institutions in Egypt and the Arab World" (11-12) April 2012.
21. First Conference of the Open Education Center, Beni Suef University, "The Role of Open Education in Achieving Human Development in Egypt and the Arab World - Beni Suef University (Case Study)", (15, 16) May 2012.
22. The Second International Conference for Community Service and Environmental Development Sector, Beni Suef University, in cooperation with the Federation of Arab Universities, entitled "The Role of Universities in Upgrading Modern Societies and Environment Development", (19, 20) February 2013.
23. First Conference of the Center for Quality Assurance, Beni Suef University, titled "Development of Quality Systems in the Faculties of Beni Suef University", (5, 6) March 2013.
24. Third International Conference on Community Service and Environmental Development Sector, Beni Suef University, in cooperation with the Federation of Arab Universities, entitled "The Role of Universities Portal in Promoting Scientific Research for Community Service and Environmental Development", (21) May 2013.
25. Conference of Beni Suef University entitled "Research Endowment of the University of Beni Suef, controls and resources and banks, (4) March 2014.
26. Conference of Beni Suef University entitled "Centers of research excellence, controls and standards, (16.17) July 2014.
27. Participation in the activities of the introductory course on the Egyptian Knowledge Bank, Beni Suef University, held on 13 March 2016, Beni Suef University.
28. Participation in the ten conference of the Faculty of Arts entitled "Towards a strategy for sustainable development in Upper Egypt in the light of human sciences", which was held on 13-14 March 2016, Faculty of Arts, Beni Suef University.
29. Participation in the first student conference of the Faculty of Arts entitled "Student activities and their role in the development of creativity and entrepreneurial thinking", held on 27 March 2016, Faculty of Arts - Beni Suef University.

Master Title

????? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ?? ??? ??????????? ???????? ????????

Master Abstract

Summary of the study Introduction: The twenty century has finished and carried through the last two centuries number of changes in the political and economical field in the whole world. The importance of Decision making has been in creased in the field of administration as it becomed the basic of administrative process in the different standards. So the success of the educational institution came from the ability of its leaders and its efficiency in taking the educational decision. Local educational administration is considered a connected circle between the educational division and schools that take its decisions that concerned to supervision on each activity of educational service. Although the role of local educational administrations in the process of educational decision, the actual fact refers to some problems as, centralization of educational decision, depending on traditional styles as experience and personal judgment, and there is no information that we can depend on, and the high leaderships are the only ones who make decision without any participation from institutions of society to solve the previous problems. The administration should take modern administrative formulation in making its decisions as the methods of contemporary modern technology which is one of modern directions in contemporary administrative thought problems in educational institutions and taking decision in the side of depending on big development in technology and specially the computer and its huge possibilities, achieving the democracy of administration and popular participation and extenuating the chances of dialogue and developing relations and leadership of groups. Problem of the study: Although the ministry of education did great efforts for developing the Egyptian education system and its administration such as national standards of education in September 2003, and the low number 82 in 2006 for the national institution of quality and orientation for decentralization as the decentralization of educational decision and the efforts done for reaching best process of educational decision making. There are many studies referee to the educational decision making that is still suffering from some problems on the level of local educational administrations. The important one of them: ? Inactivity in the organizations of administration, as centralization in divisions and educational administrations, and using the manual systems of information. ? Lack of Common styles of solving the educational andd administrative problems. ? Lack of professional efficiency for some administrative leaders in the divisions and educational administration. ? Centralization of educational decision as the ministry still has the control hand and doesn't give the freedom for local educational administrations in decision making, according to the local environment. ? Inactivity in the lows and systems that leads to unable the educational systems to achieve demands of work and speedy in taking suitable decision. ? Unsharing the necessary information for decision making and taking. ? Inability of administrative leaderships that have the hand of decision making to make its leading role, and solving problems that face it in the light of changing stages and the development in the administrative machines in the current stage. ? The leaderships feel fear of taking decision for solving unexpected problems. ? More administrative and organized decisions that come from the central administration "council of ministry to educational administrations and divisions, and following up their achievements on the procedure level" the school administration". As the administrative technology and its different elements, mental, social ones achieves the effectiveness of educational decision making on the local educational administration standard. According to the previous points, the problem of the study can be formulated in the following main question. How can we activate the process of educational decision making in the light of contemporary administrative technology. The following questions came from that question: 1- What are the principles and stages of educational decision making process? 2- What is the contemporary administrative technology and involving its issues in the process of educational decision making? 3- What is the real situation of educational decision making process in local educational administrations? 4- What are the necessary mechanisms for activating the process of educational in the light of the contemporary administrative technology? The Objectives of the study: The current study aimed at: 1- Knowing the principles and stages of educational decision making process in local educational administrations. 2- Analyzing and studying the theoretical shape of contemporary administrative technology, its elements, and the possibility of benefiting from it in local educational administrations. 3- Knowing the opinions of administrative leaderships in the local educational administration in Beni – Suef governorate and Alex, Asuiet , El Fayoum for the extend of using the administrative technology with the different issues in making educational administration decision in local educational administrations. 4- Knowing the important obstracles of activating the process of educational decision making in local educational administrations in the light of the elements of contemporary administrative technology. 5- Reaching put mechanisms of activating the process of making educational decision in local educational administration in light of elements of contemporary administrative technology. The signifcance of the study: The importance of the study represented in the following: 1- The nature of the current age and the changes in it wheather on the local or international level, and the importance of benefiting from the miracles of that age. 2- Using the administrative technology with the different elements, mental, social ones that contribute in activating the process of making educational decision from a total prospective. 3- It stands with the opi8nion of ministry of education towards the decentralization of educational decision, and benefit from the tools of technology in educational and administrative process. 4- Knowing the tends of educational leaderships in local educational administrations toward the ability of activating making educational decision in the light of contemporary administrative technology. 5- Showing a suggestive mechanisms for activating the making of educational decision in local educational administrative technology for making atypical movement in making educational decision from one side, and solving the educational problems that face education from the second side Methodology of the study: To achieve the objectives of the study, the descriptive method was used to determine the concept of decision making process, the steps and atenands of its activation, the administrative technology and its different issues, and describing the fact of making educational decision process on the level of local educational administrations analyzing the information and interpreting it to know the factors and reasons that prevent the effectiveness of using the administrative technology in making educational decision and reaching the mechanisms that contribute in activating the process of making decision in local educational administrations. Tool of the study: The study used a questionnaire for the educational leaderships in local educational administration, the supervisor of the administration, the agent, in the primary, preparatory, secondary stage – the general and technical – the directors of the different stages, chills of departments, as they are responsible for making educational decisions of the local educational administrations level to know the fact of effectiveness of educational decision in local educational administration in the light of contemporary administrative technology, the obstacles and suggestions for activating them. Bounders of the study: The bounds of that study represents in: 1. Thematical ones: That represented in: ? The concept of educational decision making process and types of decisions, its obstracles, steps, and local, international changes that effect on it and the demands of activating them. ? The administrative technology with its different elements as information technology, communications, mental technology information systems, Berrt style, social technology, administrative democracy, social participation. ? Determine the fact of educational decision making process on the level of local educational administrations in the light of contemporary administrative technology, and knowing the important mechanisms for activating the process of decision making through determine of using the technology styles in process of decision making and the obstacles, and knowing the suggestions of activating the process of educational decision making in the light of administrative technology. 2. Place field: The society of the study in the field study was local educational administrations in Beni- Suef, El Fayoum, Asuiet, Alex governorate as these administrations represent the geographical shape of the Republic of Arab Egypt. 3. Human bounders: The society of search in the field study was a sample of educational administrative leaderships in local education administrations in Beni Suef, EL Fayoum, Asuiet , and Alex governorate. 4. Time bounders: The field study was applied during the beginning of August 2008 lit the and of October 2008. Steps of the study: 1. The first step: Determine the general shape of study that includes, introduction problem of the study, objectives, importance, curriculum, tools, sources, bounds, concepts of the study, steps, and previous researches. 2. The second step: Patting a theoretical frame rounds in: A. The process of making education decision: the nature of making educational decision process, types of decisions, obstacles of process, stops, local and international variables and its reflection on the process, and the demands of activating making educational decision process. B. The administrative technology: that includes, what is the administrative technology, the evidence of using it in the process of making educational decision, the issues of contemporary administrative technology, the mechanic issue "information technology and communication", social issue, mental issue, and making decision in light of contemporary administrative thought. 3. The third step: Describe the fact of making decision process in local educational administrations and diagnose it on the theoretical side 4. The forth step: Determine the fact of making decision process in local educational administrations in light of contemporary administrative technology and anodizing it on the field level. 5. The fifth step: Putting mechanisms of activating the process of making decision in local educational administrations in light of contemporary administrative technology. The results of the study: Include : 1- Mechanisms of activating the process of educational decision. 2- Obstacles of achieving these mechanisms and the ways to overcome them. We can explain them in the following: A. Mechanism of activating the process of educational decision making. (a) The first mechanism: saving tools of information technology and communication. This mechanism: can be achieved through the following steps: 1- Make a connection between the departments of educational administration with the information net to facilitate the movement of data. 2- Saving and completing the technological devices in schools and administrations. 3- Making a site of administrations on net to facilitate information movement and its exchange with institutions of society. 4- Extending in depending on computer and providing it with date for dealing with routine decision. 5- Putting a plan for training inside educational administrations that involve programs for developing stills of using devices and technology tools in process of making educational decision. 6- Make a connection between administration in schools and educational division and universities with local information net. 7- Spreeding a culture of dealing with information and communication technology and the importance of them in making educational decision. 8- Collecting the shapes of current technology, technology development centre, place of data in local institution responsible for saving tools of technology. 9- Saving number of research sites on the internet that provide the markers of educational decision with informations that help them with educational decision making. 10- Saving programs determined for stimulating of administration with computer to train the worker on using these models in solving education problems. (B) The second mechanism: Reeping with scientific method in making eductational decision: the can be done by training the educational leaderships on scientific method in making educational decision and benefiting from styles of mental technology as system analysis and models of process researches, and Britt style in each step from steps of making educational decision as the following: First: determining problem: 1- Determine the input of problem, reasons, and outputs of necessary decisions. 2- Using drafts, diagrams and charts in showing the reasons of problem and the relation ship between them. 3- Doing studies to continuous analysis of educational system inputs and outputs to determine the places of defect. 4- Formulating of problem reasons in a number picture by a team of experts in mathematics. 5- Determining variables of controlling the searches of the problem. Second: collecting data: 1- Depending on computer in processing the data viable about the problem statistically. 2- Depending on information systems that make changing of data to information to be benefited in decision making. Third: determining alternatives: 1- Making models of data involved alternatives of solving problems. 2- Depending on systems of supporting decisions in determining the necessary solution of problem. 3- Determining the available information in formulating the different alternatives for solving problem. Fourth: evaluating alternatives: 1- Depending on the standards of evaluating alternatives of solving problems. 2- Takin a help from the analysors to determine the alternatives of solving problem and calculating the cost and benefit from each alternative that contribute in solving the problem to put in front of the takers of educational decision on the administration level. Fifth: choosing the perfect alternative "decision taking": 1- Providing the computers with several models prepared before to deal with the repetitive routine decision. 2- Depending on the systems of supporting decisions to make a dialogue between the decision makers and computers towards the extent of contributing the taken decision in solving problems and theme of decision and why we shosed it. Sixth: implemminting the decision and evaluating it: 1- Analysing the taken decision to marginal decisions and calculating the expected value from each decision. 2- Putting a time plan to achieve the decision to show the beginning, events and the end. 3- Determining an expected models of what can be achieved during achieving an educational decision. 4- Obtaining the feedback about the extent of decision ability in solving the theme of decision. (C) The fourth mechanism: Activating the educational information system with local educational administrations ,it can be done in the following steps: 1- Determining the objectives of educational information system. 2- Determining the inputs of educational information, system from material components and demanded human data. 3- Determining a system processes of data processing and changing it to data. 4- Determining the outputs of system from indicators, reports that are benefited in decision making. (D) The forth mechanism: The administrative development for the educational leadership in local educational administrations. 1- Putting a standards of efficiency besides the old choice of managers for the laddering jobs in administration. 2- Training the educational leaderships on scientific steps for educational making process. 3- Training the educational leaderships on using computer in making the educational decisions "internet, system of decision support, the enter information net". 4- Training the educational leaderships on participated styles in making the educational decision and social participation, Delphy technique, brain storm, and group technique. 5- Establishing a centre for training the administration and markers of decision on using the modern techniques in making the educational decisions. (E) The fifth mechanism: Supporting the social participation in making the educational decision. The can be done by the following steps: 1- Determining the departments and responsibilities of educational administrations, divisions, and local. 2- Supporting the decentralization of educational decision and helping the directors of administrateions in making and taking educational decisions. 3- Developing the administrative abilities and technical ones for the members of popular council about participating in making educational decision. 4- Planning for participation circles in making educational decisions and determining the objectives and the good administration. 5- Choosing the members of councils from the best characters who know about the education affairs and problems . 6- Giving a qualified program about the ability of participation in solving educational problems. 7- Giving the authorities for the councils for taking special decisions about the efficiency of some schools. The obstacles of implementing these mechanisms and the ways for overcoming them: The important obstacle expected to appeare during implementing these mechanisms are: 1- Making the shapes of technology inside the administration in a picture of separated centers "the technology development centre, data centre and others", and we can overcome them by establishing a local institution that is responsible for saving tools of technology and following tem up. 2- The role of data depended on sending data to the ministry and we can overcome it through collecting the data inside the system of information that is in the administration. 3- The weakness of suitable skills for the people who work on data in administration, and we can overcome it by continuous training and ting with material supports. 4- The weakness of infrastructure for building information net in administration and schools that follow it, and we can overcome it through the institutions of special dector as saving the necessary devices in around way. 5- There are no models for the educational decision takers for training on it, and overcome it by establishing special centers for training the makers of educational decision on several models prepared for this purpose.

PHD Title

????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ???????

PHD Abstract

Summary of the study Introduction: The twenty century has finished and carried through the last two centuries number of changes in the political and economical field in the whole world. The importance of Decision making has been in creased in the field of administration as it becomed the basic of administrative process in the different standards. So the success of the educational institution came from the ability of its leaders and its efficiency in taking the educational decision. Local educational administration is considered a connected circle between the educational division and schools that take its decisions that concerned to supervision on each activity of educational service. Although the role of local educational administrations in the process of educational decision, the actual fact refers to some problems as, centralization of educational decision, depending on traditional styles as experience and personal judgment, and there is no information that we can depend on, and the high leaderships are the only ones who make decision without any participation from institutions of society to solve the previous problems. The administration should take modern administrative formulation in making its decisions as the methods of contemporary modern technology which is one of modern directions in contemporary administrative thought problems in educational institutions and taking decision in the side of depending on big development in technology and specially the computer and its huge possibilities, achieving the democracy of administration and popular participation and extenuating the chances of dialogue and developing relations and leadership of groups. Problem of the study: Although the ministry of education did great efforts for developing the Egyptian education system and its administration such as national standards of education in September 2003, and the low number 82 in 2006 for the national institution of quality and orientation for decentralization as the decentralization of educational decision and the efforts done for reaching best process of educational decision making. There are many studies referee to the educational decision making that is still suffering from some problems on the level of local educational administrations. The important one of them: ? Inactivity in the organizations of administration, as centralization in divisions and educational administrations, and using the manual systems of information. ? Lack of Common styles of solving the educational andd administrative problems. ? Lack of professional efficiency for some administrative leaders in the divisions and educational administration. ? Centralization of educational decision as the ministry still has the control hand and doesn't give the freedom for local educational administrations in decision making, according to the local environment. ? Inactivity in the lows and systems that leads to unable the educational systems to achieve demands of work and speedy in taking suitable decision. ? Unsharing the necessary information for decision making and taking. ? Inability of administrative leaderships that have the hand of decision making to make its leading role, and solving problems that face it in the light of changing stages and the development in the administrative machines in the current stage. ? The leaderships feel fear of taking decision for solving unexpected problems. ? More administrative and organized decisions that come from the central administration "council of ministry to educational administrations and divisions, and following up their achievements on the procedure level" the school administration". As the administrative technology and its different elements, mental, social ones achieves the effectiveness of educational decision making on the local educational administration standard. According to the previous points, the problem of the study can be formulated in the following main question. How can we activate the process of educational decision making in the light of contemporary administrative technology. The following questions came from that question: 1- What are the principles and stages of educational decision making process? 2- What is the contemporary administrative technology and involving its issues in the process of educational decision making? 3- What is the real situation of educational decision making process in local educational administrations? 4- What are the necessary mechanisms for activating the process of educational in the light of the contemporary administrative technology? The Objectives of the study: The current study aimed at: 1- Knowing the principles and stages of educational decision making process in local educational administrations. 2- Analyzing and studying the theoretical shape of contemporary administrative technology, its elements, and the possibility of benefiting from it in local educational administrations. 3- Knowing the opinions of administrative leaderships in the local educational administration in Beni – Suef governorate and Alex, Asuiet , El Fayoum for the extend of using the administrative technology with the different issues in making educational administration decision in local educational administrations. 4- Knowing the important obstracles of activating the process of educational decision making in local educational administrations in the light of the elements of contemporary administrative technology. 5- Reaching put mechanisms of activating the process of making educational decision in local educational administration in light of elements of contemporary administrative technology. The signifcance of the study: The importance of the study represented in the following: 1- The nature of the current age and the changes in it wheather on the local or international level, and the importance of benefiting from the miracles of that age. 2- Using the administrative technology with the different elements, mental, social ones that contribute in activating the process of making educational decision from a total prospective. 3- It stands with the opi8nion of ministry of education towards the decentralization of educational decision, and benefit from the tools of technology in educational and administrative process. 4- Knowing the tends of educational leaderships in local educational administrations toward the ability of activating making educational decision in the light of contemporary administrative technology. 5- Showing a suggestive mechanisms for activating the making of educational decision in local educational administrative technology for making atypical movement in making educational decision from one side, and solving the educational problems that face education from the second side Methodology of the study: To achieve the objectives of the study, the descriptive method was used to determine the concept of decision making process, the steps and atenands of its activation, the administrative technology and its different issues, and describing the fact of making educational decision process on the level of local educational administrations analyzing the information and interpreting it to know the factors and reasons that prevent the effectiveness of using the administrative technology in making educational decision and reaching the mechanisms that contribute in activating the process of making decision in local educational administrations. Tool of the study: The study used a questionnaire for the educational leaderships in local educational administration, the supervisor of the administration, the agent, in the primary, preparatory, secondary stage – the general and technical – the directors of the different stages, chills of departments, as they are responsible for making educational decisions of the local educational administrations level to know the fact of effectiveness of educational decision in local educational administration in the light of contemporary administrative technology, the obstacles and suggestions for activating them. Bounders of the study: The bounds of that study represents in: 1. Thematical ones: That represented in: ? The concept of educational decision making process and types of decisions, its obstracles, steps, and local, international changes that effect on it and the demands of activating them. ? The administrative technology with its different elements as information technology, communications, mental technology information systems, Berrt style, social technology, administrative democracy, social participation. ? Determine the fact of educational decision making process on the level of local educational administrations in the light of contemporary administrative technology, and knowing the important mechanisms for activating the process of decision making through determine of using the technology styles in process of decision making and the obstacles, and knowing the suggestions of activating the process of educational decision making in the light of administrative technology. 2. Place field: The society of the study in the field study was local educational administrations in Beni- Suef, El Fayoum, Asuiet, Alex governorate as these administrations represent the geographical shape of the Republic of Arab Egypt. 3. Human bounders: The society of search in the field study was a sample of educational administrative leaderships in local education administrations in Beni Suef, EL Fayoum, Asuiet , and Alex governorate. 4. Time bounders: The field study was applied during the beginning of August 2008 lit the and of October 2008. Steps of the study: 1. The first step: Determine the general shape of study that includes, introduction problem of the study, objectives, importance, curriculum, tools, sources, bounds, concepts of the study, steps, and previous researches. 2. The second step: Patting a theoretical frame rounds in: A. The process of making education decision: the nature of making educational decision process, types of decisions, obstacles of process, stops, local and international variables and its reflection on the process, and the demands of activating making educational decision process. B. The administrative technology: that includes, what is the administrative technology, the evidence of using it in the process of making educational decision, the issues of contemporary administrative technology, the mechanic issue "information technology and communication", social issue, mental issue, and making decision in light of contemporary administrative thought. 3. The third step: Describe the fact of making decision process in local educational administrations and diagnose it on the theoretical side 4. The forth step: Determine the fact of making decision process in local educational administrations in light of contemporary administrative technology and anodizing it on the field level. 5. The fifth step: Putting mechanisms of activating the process of making decision in local educational administrations in light of contemporary administrative technology. The results of the study: Include : 1- Mechanisms of activating the process of educational decision. 2- Obstacles of achieving these mechanisms and the ways to overcome them. We can explain them in the following: A. Mechanism of activating the process of educational decision making. (a) The first mechanism: saving tools of information technology and communication. This mechanism: can be achieved through the following steps: 1- Make a connection between the departments of educational administration with the information net to facilitate the movement of data. 2- Saving and completing the technological devices in schools and administrations. 3- Making a site of administrations on net to facilitate information movement and its exchange with institutions of society. 4- Extending in depending on computer and providing it with date for dealing with routine decision. 5- Putting a plan for training inside educational administrations that involve programs for developing stills of using devices and technology tools in process of making educational decision. 6- Make a connection between administration in schools and educational division and universities with local information net. 7- Spreeding a culture of dealing with information and communication technology and the importance of them in making educational decision. 8- Collecting the shapes of current technology, technology development centre, place of data in local institution responsible for saving tools of technology. 9- Saving number of research sites on the internet that provide the markers of educational decision with informations that help them with educational decision making. 10- Saving programs determined for stimulating of administration with computer to train the worker on using these models in solving education problems. (B) The second mechanism: Reeping with scientific method in making eductational decision: the can be done by training the educational leaderships on scientific method in making educational decision and benefiting from styles of mental technology as system analysis and models of process researches, and Britt style in each step from steps of making educational decision as the following: First: determining problem: 1- Determine the input of problem, reasons, and outputs of necessary decisions. 2- Using drafts, diagrams and charts in showing the reasons of problem and the relation ship between them. 3- Doing studies to continuous analysis of educational system inputs and outputs to determine the places of defect. 4- Formulating of problem reasons in a number picture by a team of experts in mathematics. 5- Determining variables of controlling the searches of the problem. Second: collecting data: 1- Depending on computer in processing the data viable about the problem statistically. 2- Depending on information systems that make changing of data to information to be benefited in decision making. Third: determining alternatives: 1- Making models of data involved alternatives of solving problems. 2- Depending on systems of supporting decisions in determining the necessary solution of problem. 3- Determining the available information in formulating the different alternatives for solving problem. Fourth: evaluating alternatives: 1- Depending on the standards of evaluating alternatives of solving problems. 2- Takin a help from the analysors to determine the alternatives of solving problem and calculating the cost and benefit from each alternative that contribute in solving the problem to put in front of the takers of educational decision on the administration level. Fifth: choosing the perfect alternative "decision taking": 1- Providing the computers with several models prepared before to deal with the repetitive routine decision. 2- Depending on the systems of supporting decisions to make a dialogue between the decision makers and computers towards the extent of contributing the taken decision in solving problems and theme of decision and why we shosed it. Sixth: implemminting the decision and evaluating it: 1- Analysing the taken decision to marginal decisions and calculating the expected value from each decision. 2- Putting a time plan to achieve the decision to show the beginning, events and the end. 3- Determining an expected models of what can be achieved during achieving an educational decision. 4- Obtaining the feedback about the extent of decision ability in solving the theme of decision. (C) The fourth mechanism: Activating the educational information system with local educational administrations ,it can be done in the following steps: 1- Determining the objectives of educational information system. 2- Determining the inputs of educational information, system from material components and demanded human data. 3- Determining a system processes of data processing and changing it to data. 4- Determining the outputs of system from indicators, reports that are benefited in decision making. (D) The forth mechanism: The administrative development for the educational leadership in local educational administrations. 1- Putting a standards of efficiency besides the old choice of managers for the laddering jobs in administration. 2- Training the educational leaderships on scientific steps for educational making process. 3- Training the educational leaderships on using computer in making the educational decisions "internet, system of decision support, the enter information net". 4- Training the educational leaderships on participated styles in making the educational decision and social participation, Delphy technique, brain storm, and group technique. 5- Establishing a centre for training the administration and markers of decision on using the modern techniques in making the educational decisions. (E) The fifth mechanism: Supporting the social participation in making the educational decision. The can be done by the following steps: 1- Determining the departments and responsibilities of educational administrations, divisions, and local. 2- Supporting the decentralization of educational decision and helping the directors of administrateions in making and taking educational decisions. 3- Developing the administrative abilities and technical ones for the members of popular council about participating in making educational decision. 4- Planning for participation circles in making educational decisions and determining the objectives and the good administration. 5- Choosing the members of councils from the best characters who know about the education affairs and problems . 6- Giving a qualified program about the ability of participation in solving educational problems. 7- Giving the authorities for the councils for taking special decisions about the efficiency of some schools. The obstacles of implementing these mechanisms and the ways for overcoming them: The important obstacle expected to appeare during implementing these mechanisms are: 1- Making the shapes of technology inside the administration in a picture of separated centers "the technology development centre, data centre and others", and we can overcome them by establishing a local institution that is responsible for saving tools of technology and following tem up. 2- The role of data depended on sending data to the ministry and we can overcome it through collecting the data inside the system of information that is in the administration. 3- The weakness of suitable skills for the people who work on data in administration, and we can overcome it by continuous training and ting with material supports. 4- The weakness of infrastructure for building information net in administration and schools that follow it, and we can overcome it through the institutions of special dector as saving the necessary devices in around way. 5- There are no models for the educational decision takers for training on it, and overcome it by establishing special centers for training the makers of educational decision on several models prepared for this purpose.

All rights reserved ©Hesham Sayed Abbass Kamel